My vision of life, can you reason it?

Are we living in a programmed environment? And under a system that was not only engineered to build us in who we are, but to keep us away from the truth? Through the year’s people change, habits change, fashion changes but the system doesn’t. What is the system? And what are its objectives? Well to answer this question first lets take a close look of how humans think. What keeps people from doing what their instinct tells them? And what is the reason of living? Well imagine a world with no governments, a balanced level society and most of all a world that has no religious beliefs and does not belief in god at all. What would it be like? And what are the consequences?

A government keeps a systemic society working through laws and rules, religion control societies through beliefs, faith and fear from god. So brains are structured from the culture, belief and the way it interprets them, which gives out the product, the type of society. So can you imagine now what would a world without control would be like? No different cultures, anarchy would rein the world, and nobody will care for what’s right and wrong as their is nothing to loose and nothing that stops you, we would be in a sort of animalism. In fact, that what makes us different from animals, we live guided by the system while an animal lives guided by his instinct. In the past, science was something which people did not understand; therefore they looked at the forces of nature as warnings and answers from god, such as anger and punishment. That’s because their mental capabilities of understanding life and their surroundings was very weak, and they neither had the tools nor the knowledge we have today. That’s why religious beliefs were more concentrated at the time, because religion gave people a sense of protection and a reason for living. But that is the same as a Childs belief in Father Christmas; he has the spirit in him till he understands that there will be no Father Christmas coming to fulfill his dreams.
Nowadays Science great advances are showing us the contradictions between where we really come from and what we want to believe, but this is happening too fast to turn over peoples beliefs. A structure refined through the ages and that is now imprinted deep down in their brains and gears their way of living. Another fact is that even if proven 100% that god does not exist and that we are just a product of time and Matter, people will still cease to believe. That is because religion gives them a sense of hope and reason for living while making death a sense of new beginning instead of the end of life, and death is the biggest fear in life, so the sense of new beginning makes death less painful. That is why it’s a perfect engineered structure, because it is a pyramidical structure based on our weak points. A pyramidical structure that’ makes it more strong the more time passes, that took ages to be refined and is designed to give us a picture of life as we want to imagine it with a misguide to the truth, which might be so hard to be accepted as it is in our nature that we reject what hurts us even if it is the proven truth. It’s like a doctor giving news of serious disease to a patient, even if the patient knows that the doctor is speaking the truth, he does not want to accept his situation. Science today shows us that we are just a code in a complex genetical waveform, and that we are only a question of structuring the right code. We know this from cloning and quantum physics, we are no more unique as we now understood the whole mystery behind our design and that there could be hundreds and thousands of us. Science showed us that time is no longer a matter of past present and future, but a matter of where you are. This shows that there might be no such thing as beginning or end. Though there are still many questions to be answered it does not mean that there is no answer, comparing the fact that a hundred years ago we had not even half the knowledge we have today. But as I already said even if there are answers, people are more comfortable believing in creationism as it gives them a sense of relief, and that is what keeps the system going, like a clockwork in a clock, every gear depends on his brothers reaction to move, which in turn keeps the engine going, and the spring that supplies energy to the clockwork is hope and belief.
Now let us imagine a world with a balanced level society and poverty does not exist, what would it be like? As poverty does not exist anymore everyone will have the chance for education and there will be no extreme cheap labor, which will of course make much less income to the rich. We know that the world could heal itself anytime from hunger, wars and ignorance, and there are people who have the power to do it, but it will never be done as this could change the whole system, and the rich wont get richer while the poor will never get poor again. that is the ipochrecy of life, governments that collect taxes spend them in wars and ammunition, citizens that die (supposedly) for their country, and what is all this? Just a big lye undercover of the supposed justice, nothing more than business and power. That is why we are living in a programmed world, as if you take a close up at what could be done with all the money spent on wars, you would find not only that you would make rise all third world countries but hunger could can be erased from the English language. And is there really a justification for all these wars that the world is facing? Because if you take a close look at the justification most past wars had, there was almost never a real justification for it, while the citizen is always given lies to justify the actions taken. The big companies always get the profits of contracts for rebuilding the place and oil companies raise the prices for the oil. This is all done in front of our very own eyes but few are those who realize the truth that is going on and nobody ever does anything to stop it, because those who have the power to do so are the same people who are making the profits. It’s the so called political world who controls our living and not the politics full of diplomacy and media but the real politics that are going on behind the curtains which are kept away from the public’s knowledge and hidden through lies and misguidance. this is why I ask myself, why do we still believe these lies, and how can the people be so blind as if everything is going as it should? It’s because the people are more aware of who is going to win the European cup, and which horses are going to race this weekend that they are so occupied in their way of living that they are not aware of what’s really going on around them, and that is what the system wants. Even the way people are being educated is patterned. Students’ spend a quarter of their lifetime being educated to graduate in a particular profession. Half of the knowledge taught through their scholastic years have nothing to do with their profession and may never be used in real life. Instead of loosing time in subjects that are useless for the student and his profession, he could have used the time to master in his particular profession. But it is by this act that the brain is patterned from childhood to be forced in the way he thinks and the way he behaves in a civilized society.
What are we gaining from this type of life? A lot may say, I have a house, two children and a grandchild, IV done everything in my life they say, which in part is true. But everything of what? Everything of what everyone else does? What did it cost to arrive here? If you ask most of the people, they might answer, I worked 12 hours a day for the last forty years to own what I own. Well if you calculate the amount of hours you work and sleep in your life you would find that you have only about 30 years of free life in an average lifetime. So is it right to work all these hours just to make a normal family and live on? Or are we living in some sort of organized slavery?
In my opinion I conclude that, because of the nature of the human being there was the need for a system that guides our behavior and controls our cultures, but through the years the same system is being used to use us to live programmed like computers. The life we are living is not leaving the human use his full potential to discover the true nature of life, its purpose and the reason of our existence.
Roderick Bonello.
God, religions and the contradictions between science and religion. Who is right?

Since the beginning of the human race man was always in search of his true existence and the world that surrounded him. This could be seen in history from the Neolithic temples and symbolism of our great ancestors. This was because of the fact that he questioned himself who he was and who was responsible for his existence, giving praise to a superior being he called god. Through time man had many ideas of who and where his god was and by time, as man began to separate in different cultures, every culture made her own vision of who is god and how to visualize his nature. This could by seen from the pictures of god from the different cultures trough time. The ancient cultures taught he was the sun worshipped as the giver of light, the Greek mythology pictures him as an immortal being surrounded by a cabinet of other gods each given his own specified reign over the mortal world. There would have been many lesser gods, too, reflecting things which were important in everyday life: people whose crops depended on seasonal rains would think the rain god very important, while people who lived by herding cattle might believe in a god with a bull form. Modern religions picture him as a supreme being in the form of a spirit watching his fellow creatures from above, rewarding the good man in the afterlife while punishing the evil one. Today every culture has its own religious beliefs and rules, many of them are much alike while others differ more because of the different traditions of the culture which are the main ingredient in the particular religion. Although every religion differs in the rules its aims and its history, the main aim is same, to praise the Supreme Being, God. But what makes human belief in this Supreme Being? And what proof does he have of his existence?
Man’s nature to learn is by asking questions about the world around him and gives the best answer till he finds another solution. This was the way he evoluted from a creature close to an animal to the intelligent human he is today. God was the answer of man to fulfill the question of his existence and to make sense of the universe that surrounded him. By time as the practicing of religions grew stronger, it became his hope and his fear guiding him to live because of the fear of his punishment and for the hope of a better afterlife. By time, as the brain got patterned in these beliefs, religion became a sort of politic which used god to control civilization, using rules based on morals as directions from god. each religion made her own strategy her own leaders and her own guidelines to god, making her followers believe those were the true guidelines to god and that others are mistaken. Through the years religious wars have been fought to protect values, principles and knowledge while conserving faith and condemning those who doubted it. This was where religion got its strong roots, from the pressure made through religious leaders that by time got imprinted deep down in the brains of followers that became their only truth. You can see this from the faith of followers of different kinds of sects and religions, each believing his knows the true road to the supreme and that he has the true knowledge to guide his path. By time certain religions got much stronger than others because of the bigger cultures they governed and because of the power their leader’s possessed to spread their word. The Romans would often take over foreign religions as they extended their empire, and in the 300s ad they made Christianity the empires official religion. Today the two major religions are the Christianity and Islam who were also the two major enemies through religious history. Through time religions made many enemies and holy wars were fought to protect their principles, but the greatest enemy the church made was with no doubt science. From the old days civilizations answered their doubts through faith, looked at nature as the medium to god which communicated to his people through the forces of nature. But by time science was emerging, great brains were being born, great searches into the unknown were being made and questions were being answered…
As man was becoming more aware of the world around him and finding the true meaning of nature’s forces, it seamed clear that lightning and earthquakes were no punishments from god, so religion promoted nature as a gift from god. As science advanced by time, it was raising doubt in people about god and their respective religion. Science was giving them answers while religion had only closed all doors to knowledge and promoted faith as the tool to answer their doubts. This was not taken good by the Christian leaders, and the Vatican ordered tortured death to who practiced science other then that the church believed. Great people were slaughtered to death accused that they worshipped the devil, because they were the first to be different and look at life from a different perspective. The church knew that if science expanded it would destroy the faith of millions of people, so she was ready to do anything to stop it and protect its values. Man of science gathered and met in secret places hidden from the knowledge of the church, they practiced science and shared their theories in secret until time changed and the mentality of man matured to understand the true nature of science. It was then when the Great War really began between science and religion. Science could now practice in the open, searching for the true answers of our existence using the only perfect tool we know as mathematics; the greatest enemy of faith. Science’s techniques to answer the unknown were being proved not only theoretically but in few years time they changed the world. In few years’ science gave rise to technology finding cures to the same disease that by time were treated only by god and the faith of the patient, sending thousands of people to their grave. When a person was cured even if remained handicapped praise was given to the lord as god had mercy on his fellow creature and spared him, when the person didn’t make it they would say he had not enough faith in gods will. today science proved wrong the church many times in her teachings and gave answers to those open minded of the real truth, even if not complete. The church from the other way proves science wrong in denying god as she says it is logical that everything should have a beginning and there surely has to be a great architect of the universe that created everything, which in part could be true, but if there is it is surly much different from what the church pictures of this great architect. Another contradiction is that as the church sees it as a logical argument that everything should have a beginning and then she believes god was from ever, looking it from another perspective couldn’t the universe be from ever?
Science may have given a little proof that the universe could have no beginning stating the special theory of relativity works, as we know that if time is only a matter of were we are then there is no such thing as past present and future. As the great question asked from the beginning of our own existence, who are we? Is still not answered people are trying to answer it from another point of view, they’re using science to guide them and maybe one day the road will lead us straight to god, who knows? Looking at god as the great architect could make a possibility that we are just an experiment or forming part of some molecule in another universe comparing the fact between humans and micro organisms. What would our universe be if we were the microorganism?
There is where I see an only connection between religion and science, but religion wants to stay preserved in her ancient knowledge of how it pictures god and creation, we have to evolve in how we search for our true origin. We have to learn and accept our mistakes while being ready to take up challenges and change what we believe if proved wrong by new theories and instead of criticizing one another of who is right and who is wrong. We should work together, as I believe that in this way the church is only self-destructing the more time passes, as it is no longer the time of myth and fables but a time for progress and discovery.

Roderick bonello.

Human behavior, emotions and the way we express ourselves.

What makes man superior to other species? Is it true that man is different from the animal, or is it the power of reasoning what makes the only difference? What makes people think different from each other? And why what seems pretty right for me seems wrong for others? Every animal since his first second of birth begins a fight for survival, driven from his instinct he begins a quest to understand the world around him, build his protections and know its resources for future reference. Depending on the race of the species, nature reveals an animal his role in this world and his position in the cycle of life. Without instructions or lessons a baby animal knows his mother and starts to learn by instinct and from the behavior of his relatives. This is the same in humans especially when it comes to the first weeks after birth, only the instinct drives us, we do not think to act, we just act. It is only after a few months that we start to reorganize things and see differences and it is in this time that we begin to differ between a human behavior and an animal’s. It’s all in the brains capability of learning, thinking and most of all reasoning. The brain is a sort of Turing computer with an infinite network of neurons working on a set of algorithms using our senses as the inputs to process information and learn. I believe that as a computer a brain can easily be programmed and structured in the way he thinks and process information simply by repeating a pattern of information to one of his inputs for a routine number of times. It’s the way we learn and depending on the processing power of the brain to work the set of information, the more powerful the brain is. This is what forms the character of a person by time, depending on the culture of the society which is the pattern of instructions to the brain. This is what builds our values and that’s were our emotions get programmed. Why do you cross a Christian when swearing on Jesus Christ and a Muslim is not but on the other way if you swear to him on Mohammed you cross his feelings and a Christian is not? It’s because emotions were programmed on a different pattern of values, and why for cannibals there is nothing wrong in eating humans but for civilized persons its against moral? Proof of this could be seen in almost every culture, depending on religion, politics folklore builds our values our beliefs and the way we act at the same situations in life. Examples of these are the Islamic suicidal terrorists ready to take off their lives for the sake of love to god, and protecting the values of their culture. Their belief is that they died as saints while for other cultures they are freaks, but who is right? As I already said it’s not a question of who is right or wrong but a question of what got them to think like that?
If you revise the lives of these people you would find out that not only they spend most of the day since very young studying their Koran that it becomes an obsession to live for god and his values, but they are pressured by their families and government to be ready to die to protect their values. I remember an incident in the afghan war where a journalist asked a mother how does she feel that her son died fighting for his people, she answered happy to know that the bullet that killed him was fired from the front not from the back, meaning he was not escaping the site but forcing to die for his people. this is not only a history of the Muslim people to think like that, in the past we have the same history of the Catholics when pope urban II used the same tactic to program his people to die for Christianity to protect its values in the crusades.
Then I say but, is this what makes us superior? Because if you see the history of the human race all you could find is destruction, the intelligence used in the evolution of mankind, was not only used for progress but for the destruction of his race his planet and everything that came in relation with him. This is all a product of the greed man posses, the greed for money and power. But why does man behaves like this? What is the reason to this behavior of wanting to be on top? I think that fear is one of the main reasons of this, its mans way to protect himself in his life. He wants money to be superior and he wants to be superior to get respect. Its mans nature to survive as is a lions nature to fight for respect. It’s just the role that is different as of course we live guided by the power of reasoning not by instinct. Then there is the fact that animals of the same species though in different colonies behave almost the same but man does not. man forms cultures depending on his way of living and of his needs, cultures that form societies that may differ completely from one another in all aspects of life and this again plays a big part to explain conflicts between mankind, each protecting his values his territory and his people. But apart from all this man is ready to do anything for fulfilling his desires, even killing and manipulating his own species for his own benefits and this is what makes man a dangerous species. Every tool man has invented through the years was also used as a weapon against his own race, torture machines were invented through time used against his same species, is this what makes us superior? Is this what reasoning means? The ability to destroy yourself and all that surrounds you? And what about the ability to separate ourselves in different classes depending on wealth, color and education and pretending that they do not exist and that we are all the same. How can we ever end the differences we have if we continue evolving in this attitude? But if you dig deep down in the root of the problem you will find that the answer is again business and power. So one can see that most of the problems humanity is facing are the results of mans attitude and greed and that is the most accurate definition I could find for evil; man as is the species which almost destroyed himself his planet and other species not for survival, not for defense but for the profiting himself and for the greed to be superior.

What is the mystery behind existence and what could be the cause of origination?
One of the greatest mysteries for mankind is with no doubt what the reason for his existence is and when it all was started. Well through time different theories and speculations have originated but none are proven with enough evidence that could be taken as the answer to existence. Though as I already said there is not much proven evidence, I believe that some evidence we have which could answer many questions about the truth about our existence and how it all began, if it began.
Time is a fourth dimension. In normal life, time is a tool we use to measure the procession of events of space. But time is something more. Yes, we use time as a "tool", but time is essential for our physical existence. Space and time when used to describe events can't be clearly separated. Therefore, space and time are woven together in a symbiotic manner. Having one without the other has no meaning in our physical world. To be redundant, without space, time would be useless to us and without time, space would be useless to us. This mutual dependence is known as the Space time Continuum. It means that any occurrence in our universe is an event of Space and Time. In Special Relativity, space time does not require the notion of a universal time component. The time component for events that are viewed by people in motion with respect to each other will be different. Space time is the death of the concept of simultaneity. In Einstein s special theory of relativity states that time depends on what frame of reference the subject is in and that time dilation is possible through different frames. This means that traveling in the speed of light could make you travel in time and although for many people this is fiction for science it is a proven fact though practiced only on photons, and is something you study in ordinary physics. But what do I mean? I mean that it is clear that time is only a matter of where you are in this universe and if I can go to the future and my present became past while my future becomes present it is clear that in reality there is no such thing as past present and future and that time is only a matter of where you are, they are only a product of our frame of reference but does not mean they cannot be reached. So if past present and future does not exist destiny could exist and space could be from ever. I imagine the universe as a race trek and we are the cars going round and round the same race trek the one in the middle is the present the one in the back is the past and the one in the front is the future three frames of reference moving in time at different places in the universe, but if the one in the back speeds up it reached the first one but time is still moving in the same speed believe that all this is possible and is scientifically proven. Nature is a complex system that drives the complex mechanism of the universe, during the past hundred years science uncovered many mysteries of nature that were once considered as magic and miracles, imagine what would our knowledge be in a thousand years. I look at humans as an infant growing up in a world of mysteries maturing and learning the more he grows, and learning the truth behind life as he gains experience. Man tries to find the shortest ways to answer things correcting himself by time as experience shows him better answers and though mans great advances he is so far away to fully understand the full function of nature but it does not mean that there is something in this universe without an answer it is just beyond our present knowledge as was thunder for us a thousand years ago. It is like looking at a drop of water with a thousand micro organisms in it, what could their knowledge be of their known universe, but in truth how much bigger we know it is. And that is what we are a micro organism in an infinite universe full of mysteries.


The absence of free will


Freewill is an unapplicable term when dealing with the tangible nature of the human race. As Homo Sapiens, all our action is embodied in terms of stimulation and slavery- to ourselves or our envioronment. The human brain and the mind which inhabits the former are the only two true links we have to the universe we exist herein.

Knowledge, at the instant of a human's physical conception, is only present in the form of instinct, and animalistic attribute following from evolution. This genetic "hand-me-down" of evolution is the first building block of one's mental landscape, and a transfer of the most basic functions of the newborn's animal ancestors. The "which came first, the chicken or the egg?" paradox provides that this instinctual genetic information has an undetermined source, therefore leads to a mute point.

Allowing this, each human, after the moment of conception and the transfer of genetic material, begins absorbing outside stimuli, and adding to the previous genetic base in formation of personality. Through the early stages of development, a young child employs such things as trial-and-error processes, using previously acquired information as a basis for decisions. This becomes exponentially more complex as life as when know it in the bounds of time progresses.

Therefore, when one makes a choice, otherwise employs logical decision making, or even experiences emotion, it is only due to prompting from an internal function of the brain. When an action is taken in any form by we humans, it is irrefutably triggered by some form of brain activity.

Thus, human beings are only organic machines in their rawest definition. Even emotions are only allusions accepted as our differentiation from lower life forms, and in and of themselves foolery in the necessity of human comfort. We are slaves, in a sense, to the drives of our aquired personalities, unable to function any way without the impulse of one of the faculties in our minds. Nothing is achievable without these mental devices, even things we are not aware of are in some way manipulating the way we operate and function.

This brings us now to the possible explainations for the things we do of which the root and nature of the cause are not amoungst the stuff of our knowledge or comprehension. Take for instance, the example of one's favorite ice-cream: there are no logical applications presented for choosing vanilla as one's favorite, or any reason nature and Darwin would conclude that choosing such a flavor is evolutionarily advancing. Also, is genius an aquireable status, or is it severly dependent on aptitude?

Obviously, these emotive acceptions and hitherto unexplainables have been justified greatly by the configurations of God-heads. Religion is a reasonABLE way to explain phenomenon beyond human understanding.( at the given time it is being practised. There has been no proof that god exists, except the belief in the minds of peoples who have 'faith'. Even if god does exist, he has made the human race's ability to correctly identify his presence as quite a chore, thereby, losing countless people in simple obscurity. It is again highly unprobable that god exists, simply by the mathmatical odds of people's 'intuitions' being false, and the sheer number of ersatz gods to choose from.

All in all, God is hardly or even remotely a respectably recognizable force, and humans are nothing more than genetic piles of chemical commands, holding no inherent purpose by definition.P>hr>

e-mail: rodbon@onvol.net